Read from their seven most recent posts. Each one is scored out of 100 below, with what we saw behind the number.
Scores are relative to the posts analysed, not to competitors. That comparison is in the full report.
A 6-colour palette held across 7 posts (consistency 0.34). Recurring marks: bold typography on overlays, CTA in captions.
Your best post earns 0.0% engagement; the median post 0.0%. The one that landed opened with “opening bold claim about AI”.
3 images, 2 carousels across 5 posts. reels untested.
3 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 0 hashtags per post. 55 words on average.
12.0 posts a week between 27 Oct and 30 Oct. A daily rhythm, sustained. Reach is the constraint, not output.
Ranked by engagement rate. What each one did differently is read from the frame and the caption.
One bar per post, in the order they went out. Hover a bar to see its date and rate.
“opening bold claim about AI”, 0.0% ER.
“bold opening claim”, 0.0% ER.
Extracted from the frames and captions, not from a brief.
text-overlay posters integrated with subject photography (people, audience, banners)
“authoritative”
The scorecard tells you where you stand. The full report tells you against whom, and what to post next week.
See everything else Nayavo doesA 6-colour palette held across 7 posts (consistency 0.34). Recurring marks: bold typography on overlays, CTA in captions.
Fix in full reportYour best post earns 0.0% engagement; the median post 0.0%. The one that landed opened with “opening bold claim about AI”.
Hook formulas3 images, 2 carousels across 5 posts. reels untested.
Formats to test3 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 0 hashtags per post. 55 words on average.
CTA templates12.0 posts a week between 27 Oct and 30 Oct. A daily rhythm, sustained. Reach is the constraint, not output.
Best posting windowstext-overlay posters integrated with subject photography (people, audience, banners)
“authoritative”