When buyers ask AI about Technology services and software development, Promatics Technologies is not in the answers yet.
Microsoft is named in 33% of the same answers. All 6 questions are open ground, and the full report shows which ones to win first.
AI has not described Promatics Technologies yet.
Nothing to read yet. This fills in as soon as AI names Promatics Technologies.
Once AI starts naming you, this is where you see what it says. The full report shows what competitors are praised for.
named across the 6 answers where Promatics Technologies was not.
- The 6 questions to win, ranked by how easy they are
- The websites AI read before it answered
- What to publish so AI can name Promatics Technologies
Microsoft leads. Promatics Technologies can enter with one mention.
Top brands named across the same 6 answers, ranked by share of answers. Average position is where each brand lands in the answer.
- 01 Microsoft 33% #2.5
- 02 Deloitte 33% #3.0
- 03 Apptunix 17% #1.0
- 04 Cactus Compute 17% #1.0
- 05 IBM Consulting 17% #1.0
- — Promatics TechnologiesYou 0% Not named
Buyers asked. AI answered. Promatics Technologies was not in it.
Two of the 6 questions where AI recommended other brands. The full report lists every one, with the answer AI gave.
Promatics Technologies is missing from every kind of question buyers ask.
All 6 answers, grouped by what the buyer was trying to do. The full report shows which gaps to close first, and how.
-
Asking which brand to buy0 of 2
-
Shopping for a specific need0 of 1
-
Deciding what to look for0 of 1
-
Comparing brands0 of 1
-
Asking for someone like them0 of 1
recommending others
- Which of the 37 websites to get Promatics Technologies onto first
- The questions to win, in the order to win them
- What to publish on Promatics Technologies's own site and Instagram
We read 6 answers. You have seen two of them.
The rest stays sealed until you open the full report: every brand AI named, every answer word for word, and what to change.
Seven posts, scored on five things.
Read from their seven most recent posts. Each one is scored out of 100 below, with what we saw behind the number.
- 01Visual identity
- 02Hook strength
- 03Format range
- 04Captions & CTAs
- 05Cadence
Where the feed is strong, and where it leaks.
Scores are relative to the posts analysed, not to competitors. That comparison is in the full report.
Visual consistency 0.26 across 7 posts. Recurring marks: text overlays, bold claims.
Your best post earns 0.3% engagement; the median post 0.2%.
3 images, 2 reels across 5 posts. carousels untested.
1 of 5 captions asks the reader to do anything. 3–7 hashtags per post. 62 words on average.
2.6 posts a week between 20 Oct and 2 Nov.
Your best post earned 4.0× the engagement of your weakest.
Ranked by engagement rate. What each one did differently is read from the frame and the caption.
All 5 posts, by engagement rate.
One bar per post, in the order they went out. Hover a bar to see its date and rate.
“bold_claim”, 0.1% ER.
Promotional posts average 0.2%, product showcase posts 0.1%: 2.0× apart.
What makes a post recognisably yours.
Extracted from the frames and captions, not from a brief.
Look
varied
Voice
“brand”
Recurring marks
- 01text overlays
- 02bold claims
- 03case study format
- 04brand logo usage
- 05promatic palette usage
What the accounts competing for your audience are doing that you are not.
The scorecard tells you where you stand. The full report tells you against whom, and what to post next week.
See everything else Nayavo doesWhen buyers ask AI about Technology services and software development, Promatics Technologies is not in the answers yet.
Microsoft leads. Promatics Technologies can enter with one mention.
- 01 Microsoft 33% #2.5
- 02 Deloitte 33% #3.0
- 03 Apptunix 17% #1.0
- 04 Cactus Compute 17% #1.0
- 05 IBM Consulting 17% #1.0
- — Promatics Technologies YOU 0% Not named
Buyers asked. AI answered. Promatics Technologies was not in it.
Every kind of question, and how often AI named you.
- Asking which brand to buy0 of 2
- Shopping for a specific need0 of 1
- Deciding what to look for0 of 1
- Comparing brands0 of 1
- Asking for someone like them0 of 1
We read 6 answers. You have seen two.
Seven posts, scored on five things.
Visual identityPalette, layout, marks 26
Visual consistency 0.26 across 7 posts. Recurring marks: text overlays, bold claims.
Fix in full reportHook strengthBest post vs. median 50
Your best post earns 0.3% engagement; the median post 0.2%.
Hook formulasFormat rangeReel · Carousel · Image 69
3 images, 2 reels across 5 posts. carousels untested.
Formats to testCaptions & CTAsAsks, hashtags, length 52
1 of 5 captions asks the reader to do anything. 3–7 hashtags per post. 62 words on average.
CTA templatesCadencePosts per week 60
2.6 posts a week between 20 Oct and 2 Nov.
Best posting windowsYour best post earned 4.0× the engagement of your weakest.
#1 · 0.3%
varied
“brand”