When buyers ask AI about performance marketing agency services, Performics is not in the answers yet.
Google is named in 33% of the same answers. All 6 questions are open ground, and the full report shows which ones to win first.
AI has not described Performics yet.
Nothing to read yet. This fills in as soon as AI names Performics.
Once AI starts naming you, this is where you see what it says. The full report shows what competitors are praised for.
named across the 6 answers where Performics was not.
- The 6 questions to win, ranked by how easy they are
- The websites AI read before it answered
- What to publish so AI can name Performics
Google leads. Performics can enter with one mention.
Top brands named across the same 6 answers, ranked by share of answers. Average position is where each brand lands in the answer.
- 01 Google 33% #2.5
- 02 Algonomy 17% #1.0
- 03 HubSpot 17% #1.0
- 04 PROHED 17% #1.0
- 05 Meta 17% #2.0
- — PerformicsYou 0% Not named
Buyers asked. AI answered. Performics was not in it.
Two of the 6 questions where AI recommended other brands. The full report lists every one, with the answer AI gave.
Performics is missing from every kind of question buyers ask.
All 6 answers, grouped by what the buyer was trying to do. The full report shows which gaps to close first, and how.
-
Asking which brand to buy0 of 2
-
Shopping for a specific need0 of 1
-
Deciding what to look for0 of 1
-
Comparing brands0 of 1
-
Asking for someone like them0 of 1
recommending others
- Which of the 42 websites to get Performics onto first
- The questions to win, in the order to win them
- What to publish on Performics's own site and Instagram
We read 6 answers. You have seen two of them.
The rest stays sealed until you open the full report: every brand AI named, every answer word for word, and what to change.
Seven posts, scored on five things.
Read from their seven most recent posts. Each one is scored out of 100 below, with what we saw behind the number.
- 01Visual identity
- 02Hook strength
- 03Format range
- 04Captions & CTAs
- 05Cadence
Where the feed is strong, and where it leaks.
Scores are relative to the posts analysed, not to competitors. That comparison is in the full report.
A 6-colour palette held across 7 posts (consistency 0.39). Recurring marks: text overlay, award/badge imagery.
Your best post earns 1.7% engagement; the median post 0.3%. The one that landed opened with “opening personal statement”.
3 images, 2 carousels across 5 posts. reels untested.
0 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 0–6 hashtags per post. 79 words on average.
0.8 posts a week between 15 Sept and 29 Oct. Less than one post a week.
Your best post earned 16× the engagement of your weakest.
Ranked by engagement rate. What each one did differently is read from the frame and the caption.
All 5 posts, by engagement rate.
One bar per post, in the order they went out. Hover a bar to see its date and rate.
“opening personal statement”, 1.7% ER.
“text overlay”, 0.1% ER.
What makes a post recognisably yours.
Extracted from the frames and captions, not from a brief.
Look
portrait + text overlay; centered typography with badge
Voice
“authoritative”
Recurring marks
- 01text overlay
- 02award/badge imagery
- 03brand colors
- 04green accent frame
What the accounts competing for your audience are doing that you are not.
The scorecard tells you where you stand. The full report tells you against whom, and what to post next week.
See everything else Nayavo doesWhen buyers ask AI about performance marketing agency services, Performics is not in the answers yet.
Google leads. Performics can enter with one mention.
- 01 Google 33% #2.5
- 02 Algonomy 17% #1.0
- 03 HubSpot 17% #1.0
- 04 PROHED 17% #1.0
- 05 Meta 17% #2.0
- — Performics YOU 0% Not named
Buyers asked. AI answered. Performics was not in it.
Every kind of question, and how often AI named you.
- Asking which brand to buy0 of 2
- Shopping for a specific need0 of 1
- Deciding what to look for0 of 1
- Comparing brands0 of 1
- Asking for someone like them0 of 1
We read 6 answers. You have seen two.
Seven posts, scored on five things.
Visual identityPalette, layout, marks 39
A 6-colour palette held across 7 posts (consistency 0.39). Recurring marks: text overlay, award/badge imagery.
Fix in full reportHook strengthBest post vs. median 18
Your best post earns 1.7% engagement; the median post 0.3%. The one that landed opened with “opening personal statement”.
Hook formulasFormat rangeReel · Carousel · Image 69
3 images, 2 carousels across 5 posts. reels untested.
Formats to testCaptions & CTAsAsks, hashtags, length 19
0 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 0–6 hashtags per post. 79 words on average.
CTA templatesCadencePosts per week 26
0.8 posts a week between 15 Sept and 29 Oct. Less than one post a week.
Best posting windowsYour best post earned 16× the engagement of your weakest.
#1 · 1.7%
portrait + text overlay; centered typography with badge
“authoritative”