When buyers ask AI about legal news and analysis, LiveLaw is named in 3 of 6 answers.
We put 6 real buyer questions to ChatGPT and Gemini and read every answer. Bharat.Law and SCC Online are named more often.
The one idea AI attaches to LiveLaw.
Read from the 3 answers that named LiveLaw.
AI links LiveLaw with this more than any other theme, and rarely credits it for portal background. The full report shows the exact wording from each answer.
LiveLaw is third. Bharat.Law is named more often.
Top brands named across the same 6 answers, ranked by share of answers. Average position is where each brand lands in the answer.
- 01 Bharat.Law 67% #3.0
- 02 SCC Online 67% #3.5
- 03 LiveLawYou 50% #1.7
- 04 Bar & Bench 50% #5.3
- 05 Manupatra 33% #1.5
- 06 CaseMine 33% #3.5
Buyers asked. AI answered. LiveLaw was not in it.
Two of the 3 questions where AI recommended other brands. The full report lists every one, with the answer AI gave.
LiveLaw loses most when buyers are shopping for a specific need.
All 6 answers, grouped by what the buyer was trying to do. The full report shows which gaps to close first, and how.
-
Shopping for a specific need0 of 1
-
Comparing brands0 of 1
-
Asking for someone like them0 of 1
-
Asking which brand to buy2 of 2
-
Deciding what to look for1 of 1
recommending others
- Which of the 20 websites to get LiveLaw onto first
- The questions to win, in the order to win them
- What to publish on LiveLaw's own site and Instagram
We read 6 answers. You have seen two of them.
The rest stays sealed until you open the full report: every brand AI named, every answer word for word, and what to change.
Seven posts, scored on four things.
Read from their seven most recent posts. Each one is scored out of 100 below, with what we saw behind the number.
- 01Hook strength
- 02Format range
- 03Captions & CTAs
- 04Cadence
Where the feed is strong, and where it leaks.
Scores are relative to the posts analysed, not to competitors. That comparison is in the full report.
Your best post earns 0.2% engagement; the median post 0.0%. The one that landed opened with “When the selection criteria is objective, women get better representation in the judiciary”.
4 images, 1 reel across 5 posts. carousels untested.
4 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 2–12 hashtags per post. 51 words on average.
35.0 posts a week between 31 Oct and 31 Oct. A daily rhythm, sustained. Reach is the constraint, not output.
Your best post earned 22× the engagement of your weakest.
Ranked by engagement rate. What each one did differently is read from the frame and the caption.
- 01Communicates a clear public-interest point in a concise caption.
- 02Adds attribution and a read-more link for further context.
- 03Uses focused hashtags relevant to the subject.
All 5 posts, by engagement rate.
One bar per post, in the order they went out. Hover a bar to see its date and rate.
“When the selection criteria is objective, women get better …”, 0.2% ER.
“The exam schedule is out! Are you prepared for 09 January 2…”, 0.0% ER.
What makes a post recognisably yours.
Extracted from the frames and captions, not from a brief.
Voice
“Concise and professional, delivering legal updates and educational content with a focus on credibility and clarity.”
Recurring marks
- 01use of hashtags for visibility
- 02concise captions with direct links
What the accounts competing for your audience are doing that you are not.
The scorecard tells you where you stand. The full report tells you against whom, and what to post next week.
See everything else Nayavo doesWhen buyers ask AI about legal news and analysis, LiveLaw is named in 3 of 6 answers.
LiveLaw is third. Bharat.Law is named more often.
- 01 Bharat.Law 67% #3.0
- 02 SCC Online 67% #3.5
- 03 LiveLaw YOU 50% #1.7
- 04 Bar & Bench 50% #5.3
- 05 Manupatra 33% #1.5
- 06 CaseMine 33% #3.5
Buyers asked. AI answered. LiveLaw was not in it.
Every kind of question, and how often AI named you.
- Shopping for a specific need0 of 1
- Comparing brands0 of 1
- Asking for someone like them0 of 1
- Asking which brand to buy2 of 2
- Deciding what to look for1 of 1
We read 6 answers. You have seen two.
Seven posts, scored on four things.
Hook strengthBest post vs. median 20
Your best post earns 0.2% engagement; the median post 0.0%. The one that landed opened with “When the selection criteria is objective, women get better representation in the judiciary”.
Hook formulasFormat rangeReel · Carousel · Image 56
4 images, 1 reel across 5 posts. carousels untested.
Formats to testCaptions & CTAsAsks, hashtags, length 88
4 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 2–12 hashtags per post. 51 words on average.
CTA templatesCadencePosts per week 95
35.0 posts a week between 31 Oct and 31 Oct. A daily rhythm, sustained. Reach is the constraint, not output.
Best posting windowsYour best post earned 22× the engagement of your weakest.
#1 · 0.2%“Concise and professional, delivering legal updates and educational content with a focus on credibility and clarity.”