When buyers ask AI about cryptocurrency hardware wallets, ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet is named in 3 of 6 answers.
We put 6 real buyer questions to ChatGPT and Gemini and read every answer. Ledger and Tangem are named more often.
AI names ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet in 3 answers, but ties it to no single idea yet.
Read from the 3 answers that named ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet.
Once AI starts naming you, this is where you see what it says. The full report shows what competitors are praised for.
ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet is fourth. Ledger is named more often.
Top brands named across the same 6 answers, ranked by share of answers. Average position is where each brand lands in the answer.
- 01 Ledger 83% #3.0
- 02 Tangem 67% #1.5
- 03 Trezor 67% #3.2
- 04 ELLIPAL Hardware WalletYou 50% #2.7
- 05 NGRAVE 50% #3.7
- 06 Cypherock 50% #4.3
Buyers asked. AI answered. ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet was not in it.
Two of the 3 questions where AI recommended other brands. The full report lists every one, with the answer AI gave.
ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet loses most when buyers are deciding what to look for.
All 6 answers, grouped by what the buyer was trying to do. The full report shows which gaps to close first, and how.
-
Deciding what to look for0 of 1
-
Comparing brands0 of 1
-
Asking for someone like them0 of 1
-
Asking which brand to buy2 of 2
-
Shopping for a specific need1 of 1
recommending others
- Which of the 17 websites to get ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet onto first
- The questions to win, in the order to win them
- What to publish on ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet's own site and Instagram
We read 6 answers. You have seen two of them.
The rest stays sealed until you open the full report: every brand AI named, every answer word for word, and what to change.
Seven posts, scored on five things.
Read from their seven most recent posts. Each one is scored out of 100 below, with what we saw behind the number.
- 01Visual identity
- 02Hook strength
- 03Format range
- 04Captions & CTAs
- 05Cadence
Where the feed is strong, and where it leaks.
Scores are relative to the posts analysed, not to competitors. That comparison is in the full report.
A 6-colour palette held across 7 posts (consistency 0.44). Recurring marks: diagonal/angled product focus, blue lighting accents.
Your best post earns 0.1% engagement; the median post 0.0%. The one that landed opened with “none”.
3 images, 1 carousel, 1 reel across 5 posts.
3 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 0–10 hashtags per post. 36 words on average.
2.0 posts a week between 16 Oct and 2 Nov.
Your best post earned 3.3× the engagement of your weakest.
Ranked by engagement rate. What each one did differently is read from the frame and the caption.
All 5 posts, by engagement rate.
One bar per post, in the order they went out. Hover a bar to see its date and rate.
“none”, 0.1% ER.
“text on device screen 'Create Wallet'”, 0.0% ER.
What makes a post recognisably yours.
Extracted from the frames and captions, not from a brief.
Look
Voice
“concise, authoritative, instructional”
Recurring marks
- 01diagonal/angled product focus
- 02blue lighting accents
- 03cracked device visuals (security emphasis)
- 04prominent long-form product explanation visuals
What the accounts competing for your audience are doing that you are not.
The scorecard tells you where you stand. The full report tells you against whom, and what to post next week.
See everything else Nayavo doesWhen buyers ask AI about cryptocurrency hardware wallets, ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet is named in 3 of 6 answers.
ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet is fourth. Ledger is named more often.
- 01 Ledger 83% #3.0
- 02 Tangem 67% #1.5
- 03 Trezor 67% #3.2
- 04 ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet YOU 50% #2.7
- 05 NGRAVE 50% #3.7
- 06 Cypherock 50% #4.3
Buyers asked. AI answered. ELLIPAL Hardware Wallet was not in it.
Every kind of question, and how often AI named you.
- Deciding what to look for0 of 1
- Comparing brands0 of 1
- Asking for someone like them0 of 1
- Asking which brand to buy2 of 2
- Shopping for a specific need1 of 1
We read 6 answers. You have seen two.
Seven posts, scored on five things.
Visual identityPalette, layout, marks 44
A 6-colour palette held across 7 posts (consistency 0.44). Recurring marks: diagonal/angled product focus, blue lighting accents.
Fix in full reportHook strengthBest post vs. median 50
Your best post earns 0.1% engagement; the median post 0.0%. The one that landed opened with “none”.
Hook formulasFormat rangeReel · Carousel · Image 89
3 images, 1 carousel, 1 reel across 5 posts.
Formats to testCaptions & CTAsAsks, hashtags, length 76
3 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 0–10 hashtags per post. 36 words on average.
CTA templatesCadencePosts per week 49
2.0 posts a week between 16 Oct and 2 Nov.
Best posting windowsYour best post earned 3.3× the engagement of your weakest.
#1 · 0.1%
“concise, authoritative, instructional”