When buyers ask AI about economic policy think tanks, ECES is named in 3 of 6 answers.
We put 6 real buyer questions to ChatGPT and Gemini and read every answer. No brand is named more often.
The one idea AI attaches to ECES.
Read from the 3 answers that named ECES.
AI links ECES with this more than any other theme, and rarely credits it for stakeholder dialogues. The full report shows the exact wording from each answer.
ECES leads. ECSS is next.
Top brands named across the same 6 answers, ranked by share of answers. Average position is where each brand lands in the answer.
- 01 ECESYou 50% #3.0
- 02 ECSS 33% #5.0
- 03 Entlaq 33% #6.0
- 04 ESCWA 17% #1.0
- 05 Economic Research Forum 17% #1.0
- 06 Egyptian Center for Economic Studies 17% #1.0
Buyers asked. AI answered. ECES was not in it.
Two of the 3 questions where AI recommended other brands. The full report lists every one, with the answer AI gave.
ECES loses most when buyers are shopping for a specific need.
All 6 answers, grouped by what the buyer was trying to do. The full report shows which gaps to close first, and how.
-
Shopping for a specific need0 of 1
-
Deciding what to look for0 of 1
-
Asking which brand to buy1 of 2
-
Comparing brands1 of 1
-
Asking for someone like them1 of 1
recommending others
- Which of the 22 websites to get ECES onto first
- The questions to win, in the order to win them
- What to publish on ECES's own site and Instagram
We read 6 answers. You have seen two of them.
The rest stays sealed until you open the full report: every brand AI named, every answer word for word, and what to change.
Seven posts, scored on five things.
Read from their seven most recent posts. Each one is scored out of 100 below, with what we saw behind the number.
- 01Visual identity
- 02Hook strength
- 03Format range
- 04Captions & CTAs
- 05Cadence
Where the feed is strong, and where it leaks.
Scores are relative to the posts analysed, not to competitors. That comparison is in the full report.
A 6-colour palette held across 7 posts (consistency 0.78). Recurring marks: consistent use of professional settings, text overlays summarizing key messages.
Your best post earns 1.1% engagement; the median post 0.5%.
3 carousels, 2 reels across 5 posts. images untested.
0 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 2–6 hashtags per post. 177 words on average.
15.8 posts a week between 2 Nov and 4 Nov. A daily rhythm, sustained. Reach is the constraint, not output.
Your best post earned 2.4× the engagement of your weakest.
Ranked by engagement rate. What each one did differently is read from the frame and the caption.
All 5 posts, by engagement rate.
One bar per post, in the order they went out. Hover a bar to see its date and rate.
“Can Incremental fixes of Bretton Woods overcome the present…”, 0.5% ER.
What makes a post recognisably yours.
Extracted from the frames and captions, not from a brief.
Look
Centered compositions with a focus on speakers or panelists in professional settings.
Voice
“Clear, professional, and authoritative, with a focus on delivering structured and informative content.”
Recurring marks
- 01consistent use of professional settings
- 02text overlays summarizing key messages
- 03formal attire
What the accounts competing for your audience are doing that you are not.
The scorecard tells you where you stand. The full report tells you against whom, and what to post next week.
See everything else Nayavo doesWhen buyers ask AI about economic policy think tanks, ECES is named in 3 of 6 answers.
ECES leads. ECSS is next.
- 01 ECES YOU 50% #3.0
- 02 ECSS 33% #5.0
- 03 Entlaq 33% #6.0
- 04 ESCWA 17% #1.0
- 05 Economic Research Forum 17% #1.0
- 06 Egyptian Center for Economic Studies 17% #1.0
Buyers asked. AI answered. ECES was not in it.
Every kind of question, and how often AI named you.
- Shopping for a specific need0 of 1
- Deciding what to look for0 of 1
- Asking which brand to buy1 of 2
- Comparing brands1 of 1
- Asking for someone like them1 of 1
We read 6 answers. You have seen two.
Seven posts, scored on five things.
Visual identityPalette, layout, marks 78
A 6-colour palette held across 7 posts (consistency 0.78). Recurring marks: consistent use of professional settings, text overlays summarizing key messages.
Fix in full reportHook strengthBest post vs. median 47
Your best post earns 1.1% engagement; the median post 0.5%.
Hook formulasFormat rangeReel · Carousel · Image 69
3 carousels, 2 reels across 5 posts. images untested.
Formats to testCaptions & CTAsAsks, hashtags, length 29
0 of 5 captions ask the reader to do anything. 2–6 hashtags per post. 177 words on average.
CTA templatesCadencePosts per week 95
15.8 posts a week between 2 Nov and 4 Nov. A daily rhythm, sustained. Reach is the constraint, not output.
Best posting windowsYour best post earned 2.4× the engagement of your weakest.
#1 · 1.1%
Centered compositions with a focus on speakers or panelists in professional settings.
“Clear, professional, and authoritative, with a focus on delivering structured and informative content.”